Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 028
Original file (2014 028.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2014-028

ADMIN None
CORRECTIONS

 

 

| TIS | 0 yrs, 0 months, 24 days
Policy Implications | None

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for Entry Level Performance And Conduct at boot camp after 24 days of service

in 2001. The applicant was issued an entry level separation due to the inability to adapt during the first 180
days of service.

The applicant claims divulging to the recruiter prior to recruit training of having asthma. Per USCG accession
standards, asthma is a disqualifying factor for entry into military service. However, the Board notes that the
reentry code of RE-3L is the same as most former member’s that are unable to complete recruit training. There
is no mention of a medical separation stemming from asthma in the service record. The 3L does not indicate
any medical condition that must be overcome. The 3L is defined as ‘Entry Level Separation, must have waiver
to reenlist’.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

An uncharacterized character of service is not derogatory in nature and is the prescribed character for
individuals who were separated while at initial accession training and there was no associated conduct to
warrant a less desirable character of service.

An RE3 reentry code is not an affirmative recommendation for reenlistment, rather it represents that the
applicant is not recommended for reenlistment due to a disqualifying factor. The RE3 code may be waived
based upon the policies and needs of the gaining Service.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 021

    Original file (2014 021.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was issued with an entry level separation due to the inability to adapt during the first 180 days of service. The 3L is defined as ‘Entry Level Separation, must have waiver to reenlist’. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 087

    Original file (2012 087.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-087 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Uncharacterized, , JGA, Entry Level Performance and Conduct, RE3L RELIEF REQUESTED | Honorable RELIEF GRANTED None BY DRB ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 0 yrs, 0 months, 18 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged while at recruit training with an Entry Level Separation. With only 18 days of service and one medical evaluation at recruit training, there is not enough evidence to support a...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 079

    Original file (2013 079.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant claimed to be quickly separated from the forming company due to a medically disqualifying condition. Thereafter, the applicant claims to be mistakenly categorized as ‘Refusing to Train’. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 030

    Original file (2013 030.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6A, ART [2.B.20, JGA, Entry Level Separation, RE3L BY DRB CORRECTIONS | TIS | O yrs, 1 month, 22 days | Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged with an entry level separation due to the inability to adapt during the first 180 days of service. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The RE3L in this case identifies that the applicant was an Entry Level Separation that must have a waiver to reenlist.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 053

    Original file (2014 053.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-053 TIS 0 yrs, 0 months, 25 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Entry Level Performance And Conduct. After arriving at boot camp, the applicant was unable to meet the training requirements set forth by Training Center Cape May. Any entry level separation with under 180 days of service will result in a Uncharacterized ‘character of service.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 085

    Original file (2012 085.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based upon the applicant’s account, the discharge was due to the inability to handle stress in recruit training while being a newlywed. An RE3 reentry code is neither a permanent bar from, nor affirmative recommendation for reenlistment, rather it represents that the applicant is not recommended for reenlistment due to a disqualifying factor. No relief.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 052

    Original file (2014 052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After arriving at boot camp, the applicant was unable to meet the training requirements set forth by Training Center Cape May in the first week. The standard correspondence was presented to the applicant (when they are being processed for separation) for a lack of meeting the minimum training requirements. Any entry level separation with under 180 days of service will result in a Uncharacterized ‘character of service on their DDForm 214.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 024

    Original file (2013 024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-024 Narrative Reason: Entry Level Separation SPD code: JGA; RE code: RE3L; Separation Authority: 12.B.20 | TIS O yrs, O months, 11 days Policy Implications __| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged with Adjustment Disorder after just 11 days at boot camp. Members separated within the first 180 days of service normally receive an ‘Uncharacterized’ discharge. The Board recommends an entry level separation due to the inability to...

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 069

    Original file (2012 069.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-069 TIS Policy Implications 1 month, 2 days None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged on late 2005 with an Uncharacterized discharge. For entry level separations at Cape May, an uncharacterized character of service is not derogatory in nature and is the prescribed character for individuals who were separated while at initial accession training with no associated conduct to warrant a less desirable character of service. Within the...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 070

    Original file (2013 070.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-070 TIS O yrs, 4 months, 16 days Policy Implications | None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Adjustment Disorder due to Unsuitability upon reporting to small USCG Station after Recruit Training in the Fall of 2009. The Discharge was final after 4 months and 16 days service. In this case, the applicant received an Honorable discharge despite having less than 180 days of service that normally merits an Uncharacterized Discharge.